Plant-available water from field capacity to wilting point
Water held in pores between about -10 kPa (field capacity) and -1.5 MPa (wilting point) is plant available; the amount depends on texture and organic matter. As soil dries, unsaturated conductivity falls by orders of magnitude and soon limits uptake before the wilting point is reached.
Starts with: Capillary and adsorptive forces hold water: by the Young-Laplace law pores wider than about 10 to 30 micrometres empty at field capacity (-10 to -33 kPa) and pores narrower than about 0.2 micrometres hold water beyond -1.5 MPa
Ends after: Stomata close, transpiration and photosynthesis fall, and the plant enters drought stress
What am I looking at? The concepts on every map
- Participant
- Someone or something that takes part in a process or influences it: a plant, a microbe, a river, a machine, a force. Participants are the rows of a map.
- Resource
- Something a step uses or uses up: water, oxygen, sunlight, a tool. Each step has an arrow down to the resources it uses.
- Step
- One thing that happens in a process. Every step has at least one participant and carries evidence.
- Decision fork
- A step where the process can go several ways. Every outcome is labeled with a percentage, and the percentages add up to 100%. It is not limited to yes or no.
- Loop
- A line that carries the process back to an earlier step. We record whether it reinforces or balances, how strong it is (weak, moderate, strong), and its gain (0 to 1): the share of the effect that returns on each pass.
- Size of impact
- Every line says how much the earlier step affects the next one (1 to 5), in which direction (+, -, 0), and why. Thicker lines mean bigger impact.
- Evidence
- The support for a claim: a source and what it shows. Every step, line, change and vote needs it. Click any step or line to read its evidence.
- Boundary
- Where a process starts and where it ends. Every process, and every subprocess, has a start and an end.
- Subprocess
- A step that is itself a whole process, with its own boundary, steps and lines. Click a step marked ↘ to open it. Subprocesses nest as deep as the evidence goes.
- Description
- A plain-language summary of what a process is and what it covers.
- Hypothesis
- A proposed new connection between two parts of the map that nobody has linked. It carries a prediction, a way to test it, and a count of papers on each topic and on both. It is an unverified idea until someone tests it.
Every step, with its evidence
The same information as the map, as a list you can search and share. Click a participant or resource to see everywhere it appears.
Evidence (1) · added by Fern
- Hillel (1998), Environmental Soil Physics, Academic Press, ch. on soil water potential: Capillary radius is 0.15 cm2 divided by suction head, giving about 0.2 micrometre diameter at 1.5 MPa. (confidence 0.75)
Evidence (1) · added by Fern
- Veihmeyer & Hendrickson (1931), The moisture equivalent as a measure of the field capacity of soils, Soil Science 32:181-193: Field capacity was defined as water held after free drainage has become very slow, typically after 2 to 3 days. (confidence 0.7)
Evidence (1) · added by Fern
- Saxton & Rawls (2006), Soil Science Society of America Journal 70:1569-1578: Plant-available water capacity is greatest in silt loams (about 0.2) and smallest in sands. (confidence 0.75)
Evidence (1) · added by Fern
- Minasny & McBratney (2018), Limited effect of organic matter on soil available water capacity, European Journal of Soil Science 69:39-47: A 1 percent rise in organic carbon raised available water capacity by about 1.2 percent by volume on average, a smaller effect than often claimed. (confidence 0.8)
Evidence (1) · added by Fern
- Allen et al. (1998), FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56, Table 22: Depletion fraction p is about 0.5 for many field crops before stress sets in. (confidence 0.7)
Evidence (1) · added by Fern
- Gardner (1960), Dynamic aspects of water availability to plants, Soil Science 89:63-73: Flow to roots is limited by soil conductivity in drying soil, so uptake rate depends on moisture content. (confidence 0.75)
Evidence (1) · added by Fern
- Sperry, Hacke, Oren & Comstock (2002), Water deficits and hydraulic limits to leaf water supply, Plant, Cell & Environment 25:251-263: Declining soil-to-leaf conductance triggers stomatal closure to prevent hydraulic failure. (confidence 0.75)