Earth's Systems / Biological processes / Terrestrial ecosystem functioning / Living soil system / Soil gas exchange and redox / Gas diffusion and air-filled porosity control of soil aeration
Gas diffusion and air-filled porosity control of soil aeration
Gas moves through soil mainly by diffusion in connected air-filled pores, so air-filled porosity and pore connectivity set how fast oxygen is resupplied and how fast carbon dioxide and trace gases escape.
Boundary: where this process starts
Starts with: Fick's law: gas flux = -Ds dC/dz, where Ds is the soil gas diffusion coefficient
Boundary: where it ends
Ends after: Aggregates wider than roughly 5-10 mm can hold anoxic cores in wet soil because O2 diffusing through water cannot meet microbial demand
Line thickness = size of impact (1 to 5)% on a line = chance a fork takes that branch📄 = pieces of evidence on a stepNegative effectLoops backHypothesisResource used up (arrow into the step)Resource used, not used upResource made or released (arrow out of the step)
What am I looking at? The concepts on every map
- Participant
- Someone or something that takes part in a process or influences it: a plant, a microbe, a river, a machine, a force. Participants are the rows of a map.
- Resource
- Something a step uses or uses up: water, oxygen, sunlight, a tool. Each step has an arrow down to the resources it uses.
- Step
- One thing that happens in a process. Every step has at least one participant and carries evidence.
- Decision fork
- A step where the process can go several ways. Every outcome is labeled with a percentage, and the percentages add up to 100%. It is not limited to yes or no.
- Loop
- A line that carries the process back to an earlier step. We record whether it reinforces or balances, how strong it is (weak, moderate, strong), and its gain (0 to 1): the share of the effect that returns on each pass.
- Size of impact
- Every line says how much the earlier step affects the next one (1 to 5), in which direction (+, -, 0), and why. Thicker lines mean bigger impact.
- Evidence
- The support for a claim: a source and what it shows. Every step, line, change and vote needs it. Click any step or line to read its evidence.
- Boundary
- Where a process starts and where it ends. Every process, and every subprocess, has a start and an end.
- Subprocess
- A step that is itself a whole process, with its own boundary, steps and lines. Click a step marked ↘ to open it. Subprocesses nest as deep as the evidence goes.
- Description
- A plain-language summary of what a process is and what it covers.
- Hypothesis
- A proposed new connection between two parts of the map that nobody has linked. It carries a prediction, a way to test it, and a count of papers on each topic and on both. It is an unverified idea until someone tests it.
Every step, with its evidence
The same information as the map, as a list you can search and share. Click a participant or resource to see everywhere it appears.
Fick's law: gas flux = -Ds dC/dz, where Ds is the soil gas diffusion coefficient
Evidence (1) · added by Fern-C
- Hillel 1998, Environmental Soil Physics: Diffusive flux is proportional to the concentration gradient with a soil-specific coefficient Ds below the free-air value D0. (confidence 0.85)
Gases diffuse about 10,000 times faster in air than in water (O2 about 2e-5 versus 2e-9 m2/s), so water-filled pores block aeration
Evidence (1) · added by Fern-C
- Glinski & Stepniewski 1985, Soil Aeration and Its Role for Plants, CRC Press: Diffusion coefficients of O2 are about four orders of magnitude lower in water than in air. (confidence 0.8)
Millington-Quirk model Ds/D0 = e^(10/3)/phi^2: at porosity 0.5, cutting air-filled porosity from 0.30 to 0.10 reduces Ds/D0 from about 0.07 to 0.002
Evidence (1) · added by Fern-C
- Millington & Quirk 1961, Transactions of the Faraday Society 57:1200-1207: Relative diffusivity Ds/D0 = epsilon^(10/3) / phi^2 (epsilon air-filled and phi total porosity); the quoted values follow by substitution. (confidence 0.75)
Aeration is adequate above about 10% air-filled porosity, equivalent to an oxygen diffusion rate above about 0.2 microgram per cm2 per minute
Evidence (1) · added by Fern-C
- Grable & Siemer 1968, Soil Science Society of America Journal 32:180-186: Root elongation of corn declined when oxygen diffusion rate fell below about 0.2 microgram cm-2 min-1, which occurs near 10% air-filled porosity. (confidence 0.65)
Respiration consumes O2 and produces CO2, so the steady-state CO2 excess scales with respiration divided by Ds: halving Ds doubles the excess
Evidence (1) · added by Fern-C
- De Jong & Schappert 1972, Soil Science 113:328-333, Calculation of soil respiration and activity from CO2 profiles in the soil: A diffusion-production model gives CO2 concentration at depth proportional to production rate divided by Ds. (confidence 0.7)
Soil air at depth commonly holds 0.3-3% CO2, about 10 to 100 times atmospheric (0.04%)
Evidence (1) · added by Fern-C
- Brady & Weil, The Nature and Properties of Soils, 15th ed., soil aeration section: Soil air CO2 is often several tenths to a few percent, much higher than the atmosphere, with O2 correspondingly lower. (confidence 0.65)
Wetting cuts Ds: aerobic activity peaks near 60% water-filled pore space and N2O production rises above it as denitrification takes over
Evidence (1) · added by Fern-C
- Linn & Doran 1984, Soil Science Society of America Journal 48:1267-1272: CO2 production was greatest near 60% water-filled pore space, whereas N2O production increased at higher values. (confidence 0.75)
Aggregates wider than roughly 5-10 mm can hold anoxic cores in wet soil because O2 diffusing through water cannot meet microbial demand
Evidence (1) · added by Fern-C
- Sexstone, Revsbech, Parkin & Tiedje 1985, Soil Science Society of America Journal 49:645-651: Microelectrode profiles showed O2 depletion within a few millimetres of aggregate surfaces in wet soil and denitrification in the anoxic interiors. (confidence 0.55)
Compaction and surface seals cut air-filled porosity and connectivity, lowering Ds and raising N2O emissions and lowering methane uptake
Evidence (1) · added by Fern-C
- Ball, Scott & Parker 1999, Soil & Tillage Research 53:29-39: Compacted wet soils had higher N2O fluxes and lower CH4 oxidation than uncompacted soil. (confidence 0.55)