Soil compaction: stress, density, root limitation and recovery
Wheel and hoof loads press soil into a denser state, closing macropores, raising strength and cutting infiltration and aeration, with effects that persist for years in the subsoil and are only slowly reversed by freeze-thaw, roots and fauna.
Starts with: Axle and tyre loads or hooves apply stress; contact stress near the surface is about the tyre inflation pressure (roughly 50-250 kPa) and heavy axles above about 6 Mg compact subsoil below 0.4 m
Ends after: Controlled traffic farming confines wheels to permanent lanes covering roughly 15-20% of the field instead of most of it; Natural recovery by freeze-thaw, wet-dry cycles, deep perennial roots and earthworm burrowing slowly rebuilds pores
What am I looking at? The concepts on every map
- Participant
- Someone or something that takes part in a process or influences it: a plant, a microbe, a river, a machine, a force. Participants are the rows of a map.
- Resource
- Something a step uses or uses up: water, oxygen, sunlight, a tool. Each step has an arrow down to the resources it uses.
- Step
- One thing that happens in a process. Every step has at least one participant and carries evidence.
- Decision fork
- A step where the process can go several ways. Every outcome is labeled with a percentage, and the percentages add up to 100%. It is not limited to yes or no.
- Loop
- A line that carries the process back to an earlier step. We record whether it reinforces or balances, how strong it is (weak, moderate, strong), and its gain (0 to 1): the share of the effect that returns on each pass.
- Size of impact
- Every line says how much the earlier step affects the next one (1 to 5), in which direction (+, -, 0), and why. Thicker lines mean bigger impact.
- Evidence
- The support for a claim: a source and what it shows. Every step, line, change and vote needs it. Click any step or line to read its evidence.
- Boundary
- Where a process starts and where it ends. Every process, and every subprocess, has a start and an end.
- Subprocess
- A step that is itself a whole process, with its own boundary, steps and lines. Click a step marked ↘ to open it. Subprocesses nest as deep as the evidence goes.
- Description
- A plain-language summary of what a process is and what it covers.
- Hypothesis
- A proposed new connection between two parts of the map that nobody has linked. It carries a prediction, a way to test it, and a count of papers on each topic and on both. It is an unverified idea until someone tests it.
Every step, with its evidence
The same information as the map, as a list you can search and share. Click a participant or resource to see everywhere it appears.
Evidence (1) · added by Fern-C
- Soane & van Ouwerkerk 1994, Soil Compaction in Crop Production, Elsevier; Hakansson & Reeder 1994, Soil & Tillage Research 29:277-304: Surface stress approximates tyre inflation pressure; stress penetrates deeper with axle load, so high axle loads compact the subsoil. (confidence 0.55)
Evidence (1) · added by Fern-C
- Proctor 1933, Engineering News-Record 111:245-248; Soane et al. 1981, Soil & Tillage Research 1:207-237: Dry density after a given compactive effort peaks at the optimum water content and declines on either side. (confidence 0.75)
Evidence (1) · added by Fern-C
- Brady & Weil, The Nature and Properties of Soils, 15th ed., ch. 4; Alaoui, Lipiec & Gerke 2011, Soil & Tillage Research 115-116:1-15: Porosity follows from bulk density and a particle density of 2.65 g/cm3; compaction collapses the largest pores first. (confidence 0.8)
Evidence (1) · added by Fern-C
- Bengough & Mullins 1990, Journal of Soil Science 41:341-358: Penetrometer resistance exceeds root growth pressure by a factor of 2-8; 2 MPa commonly marks severe restriction. (confidence 0.7)
Evidence (1) · added by Fern-C
- Alaoui, Lipiec & Gerke 2011, Soil & Tillage Research 115-116:1-15: Compaction reduces macroporosity, pore continuity and saturated hydraulic conductivity, sometimes by orders of magnitude. (confidence 0.65)
Evidence (1) · added by Fern-C
- Hamza & Anderson 2005, Soil & Tillage Research 82:121-145: Review of compaction effects on crop growth reports yield reductions between about 2.5% and 50%. (confidence 0.6)
Evidence (1) · added by Fern-C
- Ball, Scott & Parker 1999, Soil & Tillage Research 53:29-39: Field N2O fluxes were higher in compacted soil because of reduced aeration. (confidence 0.65)
Evidence (1) · added by Fern-C
- Batey 2009, Soil Use and Management 25:335-345: Compaction lowers infiltration and increases surface runoff and erosion risk. (confidence 0.7)
Evidence (1) · added by Fern-C
- Hakansson & Reeder 1994, Soil & Tillage Research 29:277-304: Effects of heavy-axle compaction below the plough layer remained after many years. (confidence 0.6)
Evidence (1) · added by Fern-C
- Dexter 1991, Soil & Tillage Research 20:87-100, Amelioration of soil by natural processes: Wetting-drying, freezing-thawing and biological activity are the natural agents loosening compacted soil. (confidence 0.65)
Evidence (1) · added by Fern-C
- Tullberg, Yule & McGarry 2007, Soil & Tillage Research 97:272-281: Controlled traffic confines wheel compaction to permanent lanes and reduces trafficked area to a small fraction of the field. (confidence 0.5)