Earth's Systems / Biological processes / Terrestrial ecosystem functioning / Organism-environment interactions / Vegetation-water feedback and dryland patchiness
Vegetation-water feedback and dryland patchiness
In dry lands vegetation raises infiltration of the water that falls, which feeds more vegetation; loss of cover breaks the loop and bare crusted soil sheds water, so ecosystems can flip between vegetated and bare states.
Boundary: where this process starts
Starts with: Plant cover and litter protect the surface and keep infiltration high
Boundary: where it ends
Ends after: Bare crusted soil sheds water as runoff and loses organic matter; Run-off collects in remaining patches, so vegetation self-organises into bands or spots
Line thickness = size of impact (1 to 5)% on a line = chance a fork takes that branch📄 = pieces of evidence on a stepNegative effectLoops backHypothesisResource used up (arrow into the step)Resource used, not used upResource made or released (arrow out of the step)
What am I looking at? The concepts on every map
- Participant
- Someone or something that takes part in a process or influences it: a plant, a microbe, a river, a machine, a force. Participants are the rows of a map.
- Resource
- Something a step uses or uses up: water, oxygen, sunlight, a tool. Each step has an arrow down to the resources it uses.
- Step
- One thing that happens in a process. Every step has at least one participant and carries evidence.
- Decision fork
- A step where the process can go several ways. Every outcome is labeled with a percentage, and the percentages add up to 100%. It is not limited to yes or no.
- Loop
- A line that carries the process back to an earlier step. We record whether it reinforces or balances, how strong it is (weak, moderate, strong), and its gain (0 to 1): the share of the effect that returns on each pass.
- Size of impact
- Every line says how much the earlier step affects the next one (1 to 5), in which direction (+, -, 0), and why. Thicker lines mean bigger impact.
- Evidence
- The support for a claim: a source and what it shows. Every step, line, change and vote needs it. Click any step or line to read its evidence.
- Boundary
- Where a process starts and where it ends. Every process, and every subprocess, has a start and an end.
- Subprocess
- A step that is itself a whole process, with its own boundary, steps and lines. Click a step marked ↘ to open it. Subprocesses nest as deep as the evidence goes.
- Description
- A plain-language summary of what a process is and what it covers.
- Hypothesis
- A proposed new connection between two parts of the map that nobody has linked. It carries a prediction, a way to test it, and a count of papers on each topic and on both. It is an unverified idea until someone tests it.
Every step, with its evidence
The same information as the map, as a list you can search and share. Click a participant or resource to see everywhere it appears.
Plant cover and litter protect the surface and keep infiltration high
Evidence (1) · added by Loopa
- Rietkerk 2004, Self-organized patchiness and catastrophic shifts in ecosystems, Science, doi:10.1126/science.1101867: Vegetation raises infiltration relative to bare soil. (confidence 0.8)
More rain enters the soil instead of running off
Evidence (1) · added by Loopa
- Rietkerk & van de Koppel 1997, Alternate stable states and threshold effects in semi-arid grazing systems, Oikos, doi:10.2307/3546091: Infiltration feedback. (confidence 0.8)
Soil water supports plant growth and cover
Evidence (1) · added by Loopa
- Rietkerk & van de Koppel 1997, Alternate stable states and threshold effects in semi-arid grazing systems, Oikos, doi:10.2307/3546091: Water is the limiting resource. (confidence 0.8)
Disturbance (grazing, drought, clearing) thins the cover
Evidence (1) · added by Loopa
- Schlesinger 1990, Biological feedbacks in global desertification, Science, doi:10.1126/science.247.4946.1043: Loss of cover accelerates degradation in drylands. (confidence 0.8)
Bare crusted soil sheds water as runoff and loses organic matter
Evidence (1) · added by Loopa
- Schlesinger 1990, Biological feedbacks in global desertification, Science, doi:10.1126/science.247.4946.1043: Desertification feedback via erosion and nutrient loss. (confidence 0.8)
Run-off collects in remaining patches, so vegetation self-organises into bands or spots
Evidence (1) · added by Loopa
- Rietkerk 2004, Self-organized patchiness and catastrophic shifts in ecosystems, Science, doi:10.1126/science.1101867: Self-organised patchiness appears near thresholds of degradation. (confidence 0.8)
⑂ Which state persists after disturbance
Evidence (1) · added by Loopa
- Rietkerk & van de Koppel 1997, Alternate stable states and threshold effects in semi-arid grazing systems, Oikos, doi:10.2307/3546091: Threshold behaviour: alternative states depend on grazing pressure and rainfall. Shares are illustrative (range recover 55-80 percent). (confidence 0.4)