Nutrient-driven carbon allocation belowground

Plants facing nutrient scarcity send a larger share of new carbon to roots and exudates, which raises nutrient uptake and so photosynthesis.

Boundary: where this process starts

Starts with: Nutrient scarcity raises the root mass fraction

Boundary: where it ends

Ends after: Greater nutrient uptake raises leaf nitrogen and photosynthesis

PARTICIPANTSRESOURCESPlantsMycorrhizalfungiPlant rootsNitrogenPhosphorusOrganic carbonWaterImpact +3 of 5. Click for details and evidence.Impact +3 of 5. Click for details and evidence.Impact +3 of 5. Click for details and evidence.Impact +3 of 5. Click for details and evidence.Nutrient scarcity raises the root mass fraction: uses NitrogenNutrient scarcity raises the root mass fraction: uses PhosphorusFine root growth and exudation expand the foraged soil volume: uses up Organic carbonuses upFine root growth and exudation expand the foraged soil volume: uses WaterGreater nutrient uptake raises leaf nitrogen and photosynthesis: uses up Nitrogenuses upGreater nutrient uptake raises leaf nitrogen and photosynthesis: uses up Phosphorususes upscarcity drives roots togrowNitrogen: scarcity drives roots to growdeficit prompts moreroot growthPhosphorus: deficit prompts more root growthspent building new roottissueOrganic carbon: spent building new root tissueextracted from a largersoil volumeWater: extracted from a larger soil volumeincorporated into leafproteinNitrogen: incorporated into leaf proteinbuilds photosyntheticmachineryPhosphorus: builds photosynthetic machineryStart: Nutrient-drivencarbon allocationbelowgroundSTARTStart: Nutrient-driven carbon allocation belowgroundEnd: Nutrient-drivencarbon allocationbelowgroundENDEnd: Nutrient-driven carbon allocation belowgroundNutrient scarcityraises the root massfraction📄1Nutrient scarcity raises the root mass fractionFine root growth andexudation expand theforaged soil volume📄1 ↗1Fine root growth and exudation expand the foraged soil volumeGreater nutrient uptakeraises leaf nitrogenand photosynthesis👍1📄1 ↗1Greater nutrient uptake raises leaf nitrogen and photosynthesis
Line thickness = size of impact (1 to 5)% on a line = chance a fork takes that branch📄 = pieces of evidence on a stepNegative effectLoops backHypothesisResource used up (arrow into the step)Resource used, not used upResource made or released (arrow out of the step)
What am I looking at? The concepts on every map
Participant
Someone or something that takes part in a process or influences it: a plant, a microbe, a river, a machine, a force. Participants are the rows of a map.
Resource
Something a step uses or uses up: water, oxygen, sunlight, a tool. Each step has an arrow down to the resources it uses.
Step
One thing that happens in a process. Every step has at least one participant and carries evidence.
Decision fork
A step where the process can go several ways. Every outcome is labeled with a percentage, and the percentages add up to 100%. It is not limited to yes or no.
Loop
A line that carries the process back to an earlier step. We record whether it reinforces or balances, how strong it is (weak, moderate, strong), and its gain (0 to 1): the share of the effect that returns on each pass.
Size of impact
Every line says how much the earlier step affects the next one (1 to 5), in which direction (+, -, 0), and why. Thicker lines mean bigger impact.
Evidence
The support for a claim: a source and what it shows. Every step, line, change and vote needs it. Click any step or line to read its evidence.
Boundary
Where a process starts and where it ends. Every process, and every subprocess, has a start and an end.
Subprocess
A step that is itself a whole process, with its own boundary, steps and lines. Click a step marked ↘ to open it. Subprocesses nest as deep as the evidence goes.
Description
A plain-language summary of what a process is and what it covers.
Hypothesis
A proposed new connection between two parts of the map that nobody has linked. It carries a prediction, a way to test it, and a count of papers on each topic and on both. It is an unverified idea until someone tests it.

Every step, with its evidence

The same information as the map, as a list you can search and share. Click a participant or resource to see everywhere it appears.

Nutrient scarcity raises the root mass fraction
Evidence (1) · added by Broad
  • Poorter 2012, Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control, New Phytologist, doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03952.x: Meta-analysis shows root mass fraction increases under low nutrient availability. (confidence 0.75)
Fine root growth and exudation expand the foraged soil volume
Evidence (1) · added by Broad
  • Schenk & Jackson 2002, The global biogeography of roots, Ecological Monographs, doi:10.1890/0012-9615(2002)072[0311:tgbor]2.0.co;2: Root biomass and depth distributions vary systematically with biome and soil resources. (confidence 0.65)
Greater nutrient uptake raises leaf nitrogen and photosynthesis
Evidence (1) · added by Broad
  • LeBauer & Treseder 2008, Nitrogen limitation of net primary productivity in terrestrial ecosystems is globally distributed, Ecology, doi:10.1890/06-2057.1: Nitrogen addition raises terrestrial NPP by roughly 29% on average, showing nitrogen supply feeds back to production. (confidence 0.75)