Earth's Systems / Biological processes / Terrestrial ecosystem functioning / Weathering / Chemical weathering: CO2-driven dissolution and CO2 consumption
Chemical weathering: CO2-driven dissolution and CO2 consumption
Dissolution and alteration of minerals by water and acids: carbonic acid attacks carbonates and silicates, releasing cations, silica and bicarbonate to rivers. Silicate weathering is the slow geologic sink that regulates atmospheric CO2.
Boundary: where this process starts
Starts with: Soil CO2 (0.3-3 percent, 10-100 times air) dissolves to carbonic acid and lowers pH to 4.5-6
Boundary: where it ends
Ends after: Secondary clays and Fe-Al oxides precipitate; Si, Ca, Mg and bicarbonate leave in drainage; Lower atmospheric CO2 and cooler climate follow, then weathering slows
Line thickness = size of impact (1 to 5)% on a line = chance a fork takes that branch📄 = pieces of evidence on a stepNegative effectLoops backHypothesisResource used up (arrow into the step)Resource used, not used upResource made or released (arrow out of the step)
What am I looking at? The concepts on every map
- Participant
- Someone or something that takes part in a process or influences it: a plant, a microbe, a river, a machine, a force. Participants are the rows of a map.
- Resource
- Something a step uses or uses up: water, oxygen, sunlight, a tool. Each step has an arrow down to the resources it uses.
- Step
- One thing that happens in a process. Every step has at least one participant and carries evidence.
- Decision fork
- A step where the process can go several ways. Every outcome is labeled with a percentage, and the percentages add up to 100%. It is not limited to yes or no.
- Loop
- A line that carries the process back to an earlier step. We record whether it reinforces or balances, how strong it is (weak, moderate, strong), and its gain (0 to 1): the share of the effect that returns on each pass.
- Size of impact
- Every line says how much the earlier step affects the next one (1 to 5), in which direction (+, -, 0), and why. Thicker lines mean bigger impact.
- Evidence
- The support for a claim: a source and what it shows. Every step, line, change and vote needs it. Click any step or line to read its evidence.
- Boundary
- Where a process starts and where it ends. Every process, and every subprocess, has a start and an end.
- Subprocess
- A step that is itself a whole process, with its own boundary, steps and lines. Click a step marked ↘ to open it. Subprocesses nest as deep as the evidence goes.
- Description
- A plain-language summary of what a process is and what it covers.
- Hypothesis
- A proposed new connection between two parts of the map that nobody has linked. It carries a prediction, a way to test it, and a count of papers on each topic and on both. It is an unverified idea until someone tests it.
Every step, with its evidence
The same information as the map, as a list you can search and share. Click a participant or resource to see everywhere it appears.
Soil CO2 (0.3-3 percent, 10-100 times air) dissolves to carbonic acid and lowers pH to 4.5-6
Evidence (1) · added by Quanta
- Kump 2000, Chemical weathering, atmospheric CO2 and climate, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.28.1.611: Soil-air CO2 far above atmospheric levels drives carbonic acid weathering; plants and microbes raise it. (confidence 0.55)
⑂ Which minerals are attacked
Evidence (1) · added by Quanta
- Gaillardet 1999, Global silicate weathering and CO2 consumption rates deduced from the chemistry of large rivers, Chemical Geology, doi:10.1016/s0009-2541(99)00031-5: Carbonates dominate dissolved bicarbonate in rivers though covering a minority of land; silicate share smaller; shares estimated. (confidence 0.45)
Carbonate dissolution: 1 mol CO2 consumed per mol Ca, released again on marine carbonate precipitation
Evidence (1) · added by Quanta
- Gaillardet 1999, Global silicate weathering and CO2 consumption rates deduced from the chemistry of large rivers, Chemical Geology, doi:10.1016/s0009-2541(99)00031-5: Carbonate weathering CO2 is not a net long-term sink because it returns when carbonate precipitates in the ocean. (confidence 0.6)
Silicate hydrolysis: 2 mol CO2 consumed per mol Ca or Mg released, a net long-term sink
Evidence (1) · added by Quanta
- Gaillardet 1999, Global silicate weathering and CO2 consumption rates deduced from the chemistry of large rivers, Chemical Geology, doi:10.1016/s0009-2541(99)00031-5: CO2 consumption by silicate weathering about 0.1 Gt C per year (about 8.7e12 mol/yr) from large rivers. (confidence 0.55)
Sulfide oxidation and other acids: weathering that does not take up CO2
Evidence (1) · added by Quanta
- Hartmann 2009, Global CO2-consumption by chemical weathering: what is the contribution of highly active weathering regions, Global and Planetary Change, doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2009.07.007: Other acids and evaporite dissolution alter apparent CO2 consumption estimates; classified as other. (confidence 0.4)
Secondary clays and Fe-Al oxides precipitate; Si, Ca, Mg and bicarbonate leave in drainage
Evidence (1) · added by Quanta
- Riebe 2004, Erosional and climatic effects on long-term chemical weathering rates in granitic landscapes, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2004.05.019: Chemical depletion fraction of granitic soils ranges from near 0 to about 0.7 depending on erosion and climate. (confidence 0.55)
Dissolved ions build up near the mineral, slowing the reaction (rates drop near equilibrium)
Evidence (1) · added by Quanta
- Maher 2014, Hydrologic regulation of chemical weathering and the geologic carbon cycle, Science, doi:10.1126/science.1250770: Weathering flux depends on fluid residence time and saturation: rates plateau when fluids approach equilibrium. (confidence 0.6)
Warmth and runoff speed weathering (roughly 2-fold per 10 K up to a plateau)
Evidence (1) · added by Quanta
- White 1995, Effects of climate on chemical weathering in watersheds, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, doi:10.1016/0016-7037(95)00078-e: Silicate weathering fluxes in granitic watersheds rise with temperature and precipitation; apparent activation energies of tens of kJ/mol. (confidence 0.5)
Lower atmospheric CO2 and cooler climate follow, then weathering slows
Evidence (1) · added by Quanta
- Walker 1981, A negative feedback mechanism for the long-term stabilization of Earth's surface temperature, Journal of Geophysical Research, doi:10.1029/jc086ic10p09776: Walker feedback: higher temperature increases weathering, which draws CO2 down, stabilising climate on 10^5 to 10^6 year timescales. (confidence 0.65)