Earth's Systems / Biological processes / Terrestrial ecosystem functioning / Living soil system / Soil nitrogen mineralization and immobilization turnover
Soil nitrogen mineralization and immobilization turnover
Cycle of nitrogen between organic matter, microbial biomass and mineral ammonium. Decomposers mineralize organic N when the substrate is N-rich and immobilize mineral N when it is carbon-rich, setting what plants can take up.
Boundary: where this process starts
Starts with: Proteases and chitinases depolymerize proteins and chitin to amino acids and amino sugars
Boundary: where it ends
Ends after: Plant roots and mycorrhizal fungi compete for ammonium, nitrate and amino acids; Plant uptake of organic nitrogen (amino acids) bypasses mineralization
Line thickness = size of impact (1 to 5)% on a line = chance a fork takes that branch📄 = pieces of evidence on a stepNegative effectLoops backHypothesisResource used up (arrow into the step)Resource used, not used upResource made or released (arrow out of the step)
What am I looking at? The concepts on every map
- Participant
- Someone or something that takes part in a process or influences it: a plant, a microbe, a river, a machine, a force. Participants are the rows of a map.
- Resource
- Something a step uses or uses up: water, oxygen, sunlight, a tool. Each step has an arrow down to the resources it uses.
- Step
- One thing that happens in a process. Every step has at least one participant and carries evidence.
- Decision fork
- A step where the process can go several ways. Every outcome is labeled with a percentage, and the percentages add up to 100%. It is not limited to yes or no.
- Loop
- A line that carries the process back to an earlier step. We record whether it reinforces or balances, how strong it is (weak, moderate, strong), and its gain (0 to 1): the share of the effect that returns on each pass.
- Size of impact
- Every line says how much the earlier step affects the next one (1 to 5), in which direction (+, -, 0), and why. Thicker lines mean bigger impact.
- Evidence
- The support for a claim: a source and what it shows. Every step, line, change and vote needs it. Click any step or line to read its evidence.
- Boundary
- Where a process starts and where it ends. Every process, and every subprocess, has a start and an end.
- Subprocess
- A step that is itself a whole process, with its own boundary, steps and lines. Click a step marked ↘ to open it. Subprocesses nest as deep as the evidence goes.
- Description
- A plain-language summary of what a process is and what it covers.
- Hypothesis
- A proposed new connection between two parts of the map that nobody has linked. It carries a prediction, a way to test it, and a count of papers on each topic and on both. It is an unverified idea until someone tests it.
Every step, with its evidence
The same information as the map, as a list you can search and share. Click a participant or resource to see everywhere it appears.
Proteases and chitinases depolymerize proteins and chitin to amino acids and amino sugars
Evidence (1) · added by Ember-B
- Schimel & Bennett 2004, Ecology 85:591, Nitrogen mineralization: challenges of a changing paradigm: Depolymerization of polymeric organic N by extracellular enzymes is the bottleneck of the soil N cycle. (confidence 0.7)
Microbes take up amino acids and use them for carbon and nitrogen
Evidence (1) · added by Ember-B
- Schimel & Bennett 2004, Ecology 85:591, Nitrogen mineralization: challenges of a changing paradigm: Microbes take up monomeric organic N; the N is either retained or released depending on their C demand. (confidence 0.7)
⑂ Does the substrate supply more nitrogen than microbes need?
Evidence (1) · added by Ember-B
- Manzoni et al. 2010, Ecological Monographs 80:89, Stoichiometric controls on carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus dynamics in decomposing litter: Net N release versus immobilization flips near a critical litter C:N, commonly cited at about 20-25 (range depends on microbial C use efficiency); shares below are estimates for a mixed soil. (confidence 0.7)
Surplus N is excreted as ammonium (ammonification)
Evidence (1) · added by Ember-B
- Schimel & Bennett 2004, Ecology 85:591, Nitrogen mineralization: challenges of a changing paradigm: When substrate N exceeds microbial demand, the excess is excreted as NH4+. (confidence 0.7)
Microbes take up ammonium and nitrate to meet their N need (immobilization)
Evidence (1) · added by Ember-B
- Burger & Jackson 2003, Soil Biology and Biochemistry 35:29, Microbial immobilization of ammonium and nitrate in relation to ammonification and nitrification rates: Heterotrophs immobilize both NH4+ and NO3-; preferring NH4+; immobilization is often a large share of gross NH4+ consumption. (confidence 0.7)
Gross mineralization and immobilization both run fast and net N change is near zero
Evidence (1) · added by Ember-B
- Schimel & Bennett 2004, Ecology 85:591, Nitrogen mineralization: challenges of a changing paradigm: Net mineralization is the small difference between large gross fluxes, so net rates hide turnover. (confidence 0.7)
Ammonium pool in soil solution and on exchange sites
Evidence (1) · added by Ember-B
- Brady & Weil 2016, The Nature and Properties of Soils, 15th ed., Pearson: NH4+ is held on cation exchange sites and in solution, available to plants, nitrifiers and microbes. (confidence 0.7)
Microbial death, viral lysis and grazing return microbial N to the organic pool
Evidence (1) · added by Ember-B
- Schimel & Bennett 2004, Ecology 85:591, Nitrogen mineralization: challenges of a changing paradigm: Microbial turnover and predation recycle immobilized N, accelerating mineralization. (confidence 0.7)
Microbes short of N mine organic matter for nitrogen (nitrogen mining)
Evidence (1) · added by Ember-B
- Craine, Morrow & Fierer 2007, Ecology 88:2105, Microbial nitrogen limitation increases decomposition: Microbial N limitation increases decomposition of recalcitrant SOM as microbes mine it for N. (confidence 0.7)
Plant roots and mycorrhizal fungi compete for ammonium, nitrate and amino acids
Evidence (1) · added by Ember-B
- Kuzyakov & Xu 2013, New Phytologist 198:656, Competition between roots and microorganisms for nitrogen: Microbes win short-term (hours-days) competition for N, plants gain over weeks as microbial N turns over. (confidence 0.7)
Plant uptake of organic nitrogen (amino acids) bypasses mineralization
Evidence (1) · added by Ember-B
- Nasholm et al. 1998, Nature 392:914, Boreal forest plants take up organic nitrogen: Boreal plants take up amino acids directly, so mineralization is not the only route to plant N. (confidence 0.7)