Macroaggregate turnover and microaggregate formation

How macroaggregates form and break down on a cycle of months to years and release microaggregates that hold organic matter.

Boundary: where this process starts

Starts with: Roots and hyphae bind fresh particulate organic matter into macroaggregates

Boundary: where it ends

Ends after: Slower macroaggregate turnover (no-till, perennial cover) retains more carbon in microaggregates

PARTICIPANTSRESOURCESMacroaggregatesMicroaggregatesFungal hyphaeParticulateorganic matterPlant rootsOtherparticipantsParticulateorganic matterPolysaccharidesClay mineralsMicroaggregatesCarbonImpact +3 of 5. Click for details and evidence.Impact +3 of 5. Click for details and evidence.Impact 03 of 5. Click for details and evidence.Impact +3 of 5. Click for details and evidence.Impact +3 of 5. Click for details and evidence.Impact +3 of 5. Click for details and evidence.↻ reinforces · moderate · 0.4 Released microRoots and hyphae bind fresh particulate organic matter into macroaggregates: uses Particulate organic matterRoots and hyphae bind fresh particulate organic matter into macroaggregates: uses PolysaccharidesMicrobes decompose the enclosed organic matter; their products coat it with clay: uses up Particulate organic matteruses upMicrobes decompose the enclosed organic matter; their products coat it with clay: makes PolysaccharidesmakesMicrobes decompose the enclosed organic matter; their products coat it with clay: uses Clay mineralsMacroaggregate breaks down and releases stable microaggregates: makes MicroaggregatesmakesSlower macroaggregate turnover (no-till, perennial cover) retains more carbon in microaggregates: uses Carbonbound intomacroaggregatesParticulate organic matter: bound into macroaggregatesglue particles togetherPolysaccharides: glue particles togetherdecomposed by microbesParticulate organic matter: decomposed by microbesproduced as microbialproductsPolysaccharides: produced as microbial productscoated by microbialproductsClay minerals: coated by microbial productsreleased from brokenmacroaggregatesMicroaggregates: released from broken macroaggregatesretained inmicroaggregatesCarbon: retained in microaggregatesStart: Macroaggregateturnover andmicroaggrega…STARTStart: Macroaggregate turnover and microaggregate formationEnd: Macroaggregateturnover andmicroaggrega…ENDEnd: Macroaggregate turnover and microaggregate formationRoots and hyphae bindfresh particulateorganic matter in…📄1Roots and hyphae bind fresh particulate organic matter into macroaggregatesMicrobes decompose theenclosed organicmatter; their produc…📄1Microbes decompose the enclosed organic matter; their products coat it with clayMacroaggregate breaksdown and releasesstable microaggregates📄1Macroaggregate breaks down and releases stable microaggregatesSlower macroaggregateturnover (no-till,perennial cove…📄1Slower macroaggregate turnover (no-till, perennial cover) retains more carbon in microaggregates
Line thickness = size of impact (1 to 5)% on a line = chance a fork takes that branch📄 = pieces of evidence on a stepNegative effectLoops backHypothesisResource used up (arrow into the step)Resource used, not used upResource made or released (arrow out of the step)
What am I looking at? The concepts on every map
Participant
Someone or something that takes part in a process or influences it: a plant, a microbe, a river, a machine, a force. Participants are the rows of a map.
Resource
Something a step uses or uses up: water, oxygen, sunlight, a tool. Each step has an arrow down to the resources it uses.
Step
One thing that happens in a process. Every step has at least one participant and carries evidence.
Decision fork
A step where the process can go several ways. Every outcome is labeled with a percentage, and the percentages add up to 100%. It is not limited to yes or no.
Loop
A line that carries the process back to an earlier step. We record whether it reinforces or balances, how strong it is (weak, moderate, strong), and its gain (0 to 1): the share of the effect that returns on each pass.
Size of impact
Every line says how much the earlier step affects the next one (1 to 5), in which direction (+, -, 0), and why. Thicker lines mean bigger impact.
Evidence
The support for a claim: a source and what it shows. Every step, line, change and vote needs it. Click any step or line to read its evidence.
Boundary
Where a process starts and where it ends. Every process, and every subprocess, has a start and an end.
Subprocess
A step that is itself a whole process, with its own boundary, steps and lines. Click a step marked ↘ to open it. Subprocesses nest as deep as the evidence goes.
Description
A plain-language summary of what a process is and what it covers.
Hypothesis
A proposed new connection between two parts of the map that nobody has linked. It carries a prediction, a way to test it, and a count of papers on each topic and on both. It is an unverified idea until someone tests it.

Every step, with its evidence

The same information as the map, as a list you can search and share. Click a participant or resource to see everywhere it appears.

Roots and hyphae bind fresh particulate organic matter into macroaggregates
Evidence (1) · added by Cinder
  • Tisdall & Oades 1982, J Soil Sci 33:141: Roots and hyphae enmesh microaggregates into macroaggregates; transient and temporary binding agents (confidence 0.9)
Microbes decompose the enclosed organic matter; their products coat it with clay
Evidence (1) · added by Cinder
  • Six, Elliott & Paustian 2000, Soil Biol Biochem 32:2099: Encrusted POM becomes the core of new microaggregates (confidence 0.8)
Macroaggregate breaks down and releases stable microaggregates
Evidence (1) · added by Cinder
  • Six, Elliott & Paustian 2000, Soil Biol Biochem 32:2099: Labile binding agents decay, freeing microaggregates which are the stable fraction (confidence 0.8)
Slower macroaggregate turnover (no-till, perennial cover) retains more carbon in microaggregates
Evidence (1) · added by Cinder
  • Six et al. 2000, Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:681: No-till has slower macroaggregate turnover and more microaggregates within macroaggregates than conventional tillage (confidence 0.8)