Earth's Systems / Biological processes / Terrestrial ecosystem functioning / Living soil system / Cation exchange, pH and soil solution chemistry / Phosphate sorption on Fe and Al oxides and phosphorus availability
Phosphate sorption on Fe and Al oxides and phosphorus availability
Phosphate from solution binds to Fe and Al oxide surfaces by ligand exchange, first fast and then through slow diffusion into the oxide, until little remains available to plants. Liming, root exudates and sorbent saturation determine how much stays in solution or is lost.
Boundary: where this process starts
Starts with: Soil solution holds only about 1 to 10 micromolar phosphate, far less than the amount in the solid phase
Boundary: where it ends
Ends after: Once sorbent saturation passes roughly 25 percent phosphate losses by leaching and runoff rise steeply; Roots exude citrate, oxalate and acid phosphatase and form cluster roots, mobilising sorbed and organic phosphate
Line thickness = size of impact (1 to 5)% on a line = chance a fork takes that branch📄 = pieces of evidence on a stepNegative effectLoops backHypothesisResource used up (arrow into the step)Resource used, not used upResource made or released (arrow out of the step)
What am I looking at? The concepts on every map
- Participant
- Someone or something that takes part in a process or influences it: a plant, a microbe, a river, a machine, a force. Participants are the rows of a map.
- Resource
- Something a step uses or uses up: water, oxygen, sunlight, a tool. Each step has an arrow down to the resources it uses.
- Step
- One thing that happens in a process. Every step has at least one participant and carries evidence.
- Decision fork
- A step where the process can go several ways. Every outcome is labeled with a percentage, and the percentages add up to 100%. It is not limited to yes or no.
- Loop
- A line that carries the process back to an earlier step. We record whether it reinforces or balances, how strong it is (weak, moderate, strong), and its gain (0 to 1): the share of the effect that returns on each pass.
- Size of impact
- Every line says how much the earlier step affects the next one (1 to 5), in which direction (+, -, 0), and why. Thicker lines mean bigger impact.
- Evidence
- The support for a claim: a source and what it shows. Every step, line, change and vote needs it. Click any step or line to read its evidence.
- Boundary
- Where a process starts and where it ends. Every process, and every subprocess, has a start and an end.
- Subprocess
- A step that is itself a whole process, with its own boundary, steps and lines. Click a step marked ↘ to open it. Subprocesses nest as deep as the evidence goes.
- Description
- A plain-language summary of what a process is and what it covers.
- Hypothesis
- A proposed new connection between two parts of the map that nobody has linked. It carries a prediction, a way to test it, and a count of papers on each topic and on both. It is an unverified idea until someone tests it.
Every step, with its evidence
The same information as the map, as a list you can search and share. Click a participant or resource to see everywhere it appears.
Soil solution holds only about 1 to 10 micromolar phosphate, far less than the amount in the solid phase
Evidence (1) · added by Fern
- Schachtman, Reid & Ayling (1998), Phosphorus uptake by plants: from soil to cell, Plant Physiology 116:447-453: Soil solution phosphate is typically about 1 micromolar or at most 10 micromolar, so P diffusion limits uptake. (confidence 0.8)
Phosphate displaces OH and OH2 on goethite, gibbsite and allophane surfaces, forming inner-sphere complexes
Evidence (1) · added by Fern
- Parfitt (1978), Advances in Agronomy 30:1-50: Ligand exchange forms bidentate inner-sphere phosphate complexes; adsorption falls as pH rises. (confidence 0.8)
Sorption capacity scales with oxalate-extractable Al + Fe, and saturation degree is phosphate divided by 0.5 times (Al + Fe)
Evidence (1) · added by Fern
- Beauchemin & Simard (1999), Soil phosphorus saturation degree: review of some indices and their suitability for P management in Quebec, Canadian Journal of Soil Science 79:615-625: The P saturation index uses oxalate P divided by alpha times (Al + Fe), with alpha about 0.5. (confidence 0.6)
Slow solid-state diffusion into oxide micropores over days to years converts labile to occluded phosphate
Evidence (1) · added by Fern
- Barrow (1983), A mechanistic model for describing the sorption and desorption of phosphate by soil, Journal of Soil Science 34:733-750: Phosphate reacts in a fast adsorption stage (hours) followed by slow penetration into the solid (days to years). (confidence 0.8)
Liming to pH 6 to 7 reduces positive surface charge on oxides and modestly raises phosphate availability
Evidence (1) · added by Fern
- Haynes (1982), Effects of liming on phosphate availability in acid soils, Plant and Soil 68:289-308: Liming increases phosphate availability through pH-dependent desorption, with effects that vary among soils. (confidence 0.75)
Roots exude citrate, oxalate and acid phosphatase and form cluster roots, mobilising sorbed and organic phosphate
Evidence (1) · added by Fern
- Lambers, Shane, Cramer, Pearse & Veneklaas (2006), Root structure and functioning for efficient acquisition of phosphorus, Annals of Botany 98:693-713: Carboxylate release and cluster roots of Proteaceae and Lupinus mobilise phosphate from sorbed pools. (confidence 0.8)
Low solution phosphate triggers more exudation and root proliferation, which lifts supply
Evidence (1) · added by Fern
- Lambers et al. (2006), Annals of Botany 98:693-713: P deficiency up-regulates carboxylate exudation and root hair density in many species. (confidence 0.7)
Once sorbent saturation passes roughly 25 percent phosphate losses by leaching and runoff rise steeply
Evidence (1) · added by Fern
- Sims, Edwards, Schoumans & Simard (2000), Integrating soil phosphorus testing into environmentally based agricultural management practices, Journal of Environmental Quality 29:60-71: Change points in P loss versus soil P and degree of saturation indicate loss rises above a threshold. (confidence 0.6)