Biological uptake, litter return and mineralization
How plants take up nutrients, allocate and resorb them, and return the remainder in litter, followed by decomposition that either mineralizes nutrients for reuse or immobilizes them in microbial biomass.
Boundary: where this process starts
Starts with: Roots and mycorrhizal fungi take up nutrients from soil solution
Boundary: where it ends
Ends after: Net mineralization releases inorganic N and P; Microbes immobilize nutrients in their biomass
Line thickness = size of impact (1 to 5)% on a line = chance a fork takes that branch📄 = pieces of evidence on a stepNegative effectLoops backHypothesisResource used up (arrow into the step)Resource used, not used upResource made or released (arrow out of the step)
What am I looking at? The concepts on every map
- Participant
- Someone or something that takes part in a process or influences it: a plant, a microbe, a river, a machine, a force. Participants are the rows of a map.
- Resource
- Something a step uses or uses up: water, oxygen, sunlight, a tool. Each step has an arrow down to the resources it uses.
- Step
- One thing that happens in a process. Every step has at least one participant and carries evidence.
- Decision fork
- A step where the process can go several ways. Every outcome is labeled with a percentage, and the percentages add up to 100%. It is not limited to yes or no.
- Loop
- A line that carries the process back to an earlier step. We record whether it reinforces or balances, how strong it is (weak, moderate, strong), and its gain (0 to 1): the share of the effect that returns on each pass.
- Size of impact
- Every line says how much the earlier step affects the next one (1 to 5), in which direction (+, -, 0), and why. Thicker lines mean bigger impact.
- Evidence
- The support for a claim: a source and what it shows. Every step, line, change and vote needs it. Click any step or line to read its evidence.
- Boundary
- Where a process starts and where it ends. Every process, and every subprocess, has a start and an end.
- Subprocess
- A step that is itself a whole process, with its own boundary, steps and lines. Click a step marked ↘ to open it. Subprocesses nest as deep as the evidence goes.
- Description
- A plain-language summary of what a process is and what it covers.
- Hypothesis
- A proposed new connection between two parts of the map that nobody has linked. It carries a prediction, a way to test it, and a count of papers on each topic and on both. It is an unverified idea until someone tests it.
Every step, with its evidence
The same information as the map, as a list you can search and share. Click a participant or resource to see everywhere it appears.
Roots and mycorrhizal fungi take up nutrients from soil solution
Evidence (1) · added by Brook
- Brady & Weil 2016, The Nature and Properties of Soils, 15th ed., chapters on nitrogen and sulfur economy and on soil phosphorus: Plant nutrient uptake is by diffusion and mass flow supplemented by mycorrhizal hyphae. (confidence 0.8)
Nutrients are allocated to leaves, wood and roots
Evidence (1) · added by Brook
- Schlesinger & Bernhardt 2013, Biogeochemistry: An Analysis of Global Change, 3rd ed., chapters on the land, wetlands and global nitrogen and phosphorus cycles: Plant tissue stoichiometry is about C:N:P of 800:20:1 in leaves. (confidence 0.6)
⑂ Leaves senesce and plants withdraw nutrients first
Evidence (1) · added by Brook
- Vergutz et al. 2012, Global resorption efficiencies of trees and shrubs: nitrogen and phosphorus, Ecological Monographs 82:205-220: Trees resorb about 62% of leaf N and 65% of leaf P before leaf fall. (confidence 0.8)
Nutrients are resorbed and stored for the next growth flush
Evidence (1) · added by Brook
- Vergutz et al. 2012, Global resorption efficiencies of trees and shrubs: nitrogen and phosphorus, Ecological Monographs 82:205-220: Resorption lowers dependence on soil supply. (confidence 0.8)
Remaining nutrients drop in litter
Evidence (1) · added by Brook
- Vergutz et al. 2012, Global resorption efficiencies of trees and shrubs: nitrogen and phosphorus, Ecological Monographs 82:205-220: About a third of leaf N and P stays in litter. (confidence 0.8)
⑂ Decomposers break down litter; outcome depends on its carbon to nitrogen ratio
Evidence (1) · added by Brook
- Brady & Weil 2016, The Nature and Properties of Soils, 15th ed., chapters on nitrogen and sulfur economy and on soil phosphorus: Net mineralization occurs when litter C:N is below roughly 25 and net immobilization above it. (confidence 0.6)
Net mineralization releases inorganic N and P
Evidence (1) · added by Brook
- Brady & Weil 2016, The Nature and Properties of Soils, 15th ed., chapters on nitrogen and sulfur economy and on soil phosphorus: Excess nutrients beyond microbial demand are released. (confidence 0.8)
Microbes immobilize nutrients in their biomass
Evidence (1) · added by Brook
- Brady & Weil 2016, The Nature and Properties of Soils, 15th ed., chapters on nitrogen and sulfur economy and on soil phosphorus: Microbes compete with plants for mineral N when litter is carbon-rich. (confidence 0.8)
Microbial turnover and grazing release nutrients
Evidence (1) · added by Brook
- Clarholm 1985, Interactions of bacteria, protozoa and plants leading to mineralization of soil nitrogen, Soil Biology and Biochemistry 17:181-187: Protozoan grazing on bacteria (the microbial loop in soil) releases N for plants. (confidence 0.8)
Warming and moisture speed or slow mineralization
Evidence (1) · added by Brook
- Davidson & Janssens 2006, Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change, Nature 440:165-173: Rates of decomposition and mineralization rise with temperature and are highest at intermediate moisture. (confidence 0.7)