Earth's Systems / Biological processes / Terrestrial ecosystem functioning / Living soil system / Water infiltration, retention and movement / Unsaturated hydraulic conductivity and Richards flow
Unsaturated hydraulic conductivity and Richards flow
How the flux of liquid water in soil follows the Buckingham-Darcy law, with hydraulic conductivity falling by orders of magnitude as pores drain, controlling infiltration, redistribution and the supply of water to roots.
Boundary: where this process starts
Starts with: Flux follows Buckingham-Darcy, q = -K(h) times the gradient of total potential, and combined with mass balance gives the Richards equation
Boundary: where it ends
Ends after: Roots move water at night by hydraulic lift from moist deep layers to dry shallow layers
Line thickness = size of impact (1 to 5)% on a line = chance a fork takes that branch📄 = pieces of evidence on a stepNegative effectLoops backHypothesisResource used up (arrow into the step)Resource used, not used upResource made or released (arrow out of the step)
What am I looking at? The concepts on every map
- Participant
- Someone or something that takes part in a process or influences it: a plant, a microbe, a river, a machine, a force. Participants are the rows of a map.
- Resource
- Something a step uses or uses up: water, oxygen, sunlight, a tool. Each step has an arrow down to the resources it uses.
- Step
- One thing that happens in a process. Every step has at least one participant and carries evidence.
- Decision fork
- A step where the process can go several ways. Every outcome is labeled with a percentage, and the percentages add up to 100%. It is not limited to yes or no.
- Loop
- A line that carries the process back to an earlier step. We record whether it reinforces or balances, how strong it is (weak, moderate, strong), and its gain (0 to 1): the share of the effect that returns on each pass.
- Size of impact
- Every line says how much the earlier step affects the next one (1 to 5), in which direction (+, -, 0), and why. Thicker lines mean bigger impact.
- Evidence
- The support for a claim: a source and what it shows. Every step, line, change and vote needs it. Click any step or line to read its evidence.
- Boundary
- Where a process starts and where it ends. Every process, and every subprocess, has a start and an end.
- Subprocess
- A step that is itself a whole process, with its own boundary, steps and lines. Click a step marked ↘ to open it. Subprocesses nest as deep as the evidence goes.
- Description
- A plain-language summary of what a process is and what it covers.
- Hypothesis
- A proposed new connection between two parts of the map that nobody has linked. It carries a prediction, a way to test it, and a count of papers on each topic and on both. It is an unverified idea until someone tests it.
Every step, with its evidence
The same information as the map, as a list you can search and share. Click a participant or resource to see everywhere it appears.
Flux follows Buckingham-Darcy, q = -K(h) times the gradient of total potential, and combined with mass balance gives the Richards equation
Evidence (1) · added by Fern-C
- Richards 1931, Physics 1:318-333, Capillary conduction of liquids through porous mediums: Extended Darcy law to unsaturated media with water-content dependent conductivity; basis of the Richards equation. (confidence 0.85)
Flow through a pore scales with radius to the fourth power, so doubling radius gives 16 times the flow and large pores dominate conductivity
Evidence (1) · added by Fern-C
- Hillel 1998, Environmental Soil Physics (Poiseuille law): Poiseuille flow in a capillary is proportional to r^4, so conductivity is governed by the widest water-filled pores. (confidence 0.85)
Saturated conductivity spans about three orders of magnitude by texture: sand about 20 cm/h, silt loam about 0.7 cm/h, clay about 0.03-0.1 cm/h
Evidence (1) · added by Fern-C
- Rawls, Brakensiek & Saxton 1982, Transactions of the ASAE 25:1316-1320: Mean saturated hydraulic conductivity by USDA texture class, from about 21 cm/h in sand to below 0.1 cm/h in clays. (confidence 0.6)
Surface seals, compaction or water repellency throttle the top boundary, so rain exceeding the seal conductivity runs off
Evidence (1) · added by Fern-C
- Assouline 2004, Vadose Zone Journal 3:570-591, Rainfall-induced soil surface sealing: Seal saturated conductivity is one to three orders of magnitude below that of the underlying soil, controlling infiltration and runoff. (confidence 0.6)
Hydraulic conductivity drops steeply as suction rises because the largest pores drain first
Evidence (1) · added by Fern-C
- van Genuchten 1980, Soil Science Society of America Journal 44:892-898; Mualem 1976, Water Resources Research 12:513-522: Closed-form K(h) from the retention curve predicts K falling by many orders of magnitude between saturation and dry soil. (confidence 0.85)
With Carsel & Parrish parameters in the van Genuchten-Mualem model, K at -10 kPa is about 1e-8 of Ks for sand but about 4e-3 of Ks for clay, so at that suction clay conducts more than sand
Evidence (1) · added by Fern-C
- Carsel & Parrish 1988, Water Resources Research 24:755-769: Sand: alpha 0.145 per cm, n 2.68, Ks 713 cm/d; clay: alpha 0.008 per cm, n 1.09, Ks 4.8 cm/d; substituting at h = 100 cm gives the quoted ratios (derived estimate). (confidence 0.65)
Infiltration rate starts high and declines toward the saturated conductivity as the wetted zone deepens
Evidence (1) · added by Fern-C
- Green & Ampt 1911, Journal of Agricultural Science 4:1-24: Infiltration rate falls as 1/depth of the wetting front, approaching Ks at long times. (confidence 0.85)
In dry soil conductivity is so low that supply to roots, not root uptake capacity, limits transpiration, so plants wilt with some water still in the soil
Evidence (1) · added by Fern-C
- Gardner 1960, Soil Science 89:63-73, Dynamic aspects of water availability to plants: At low soil water content the soil conductivity becomes limiting for root water uptake. (confidence 0.7)
Roots move water at night by hydraulic lift from moist deep layers to dry shallow layers
Evidence (1) · added by Fern-C
- Richards & Caldwell 1987, Oecologia 73:486-489; Neumann & Cardon 2012, New Phytologist 194:337-352: Sagebrush roots lifted water from deep moist soil into dry upper soil overnight, raising its water potential. (confidence 0.85)