Earth's Systems / Biological processes / Terrestrial ecosystem functioning / Primary production / Belowground carbon allocation to roots and mycorrhizal fungi

Belowground carbon allocation to roots and mycorrhizal fungi

Part of net primary production goes to roots and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi as a carbon payment for nutrient uptake, and this cost shrinks when nutrients are abundant.

Boundary: where this process starts

Starts with: Photosynthate is translocated to roots and fungal partner

Boundary: where it ends

Ends after: Root-derived carbon enters the soil food web

PARTICIPANTSRESOURCESPlantsFungiEarthwormsOrganic carbonPhosphorusEnergyImpact +3 of 5. Click for details and evidence.Impact +3 of 5. Click for details and evidence.Impact 03 of 5. Click for details and evidence.Impact -3 of 5. Click for details and evidence.55% Low soil PImpact +3 of 5. Click for details and evidence.45% High soil PImpact +3 of 5. Click for details and evidence.Impact +2 of 5. Click for details and evidence.Impact +3 of 5. Click for details and evidence.Impact -3 of 5. Click for details and evidence.↻ balances · moderate · 0.3 P gained reducesPhotosynthate is translocated to roots and fungal partner: uses Organic carbonFungal hyphae deliver phosphorus to the plant: uses PhosphorusPhosphorus availability sets the carbon cost of nutrient uptake: uses Organic carbonPhosphorus availability sets the carbon cost of nutrient uptake: uses PhosphorusP-poor soil: high belowground allocation and carbon cost: uses Organic carbonP-rich soil: low belowground allocation and carbon cost: uses Organic carbonRoot-derived carbon enters the soil food web: uses Organic carbonRoot-derived carbon enters the soil food web: uses Energytranslocated to rootsand fungiOrganic carbon: translocated to roots and fungidelivered by hyphaePhosphorus: delivered by hyphaespent acquiringnutrientsOrganic carbon: spent acquiring nutrientsavailability sets uptakecostPhosphorus: availability sets uptake costallocated heavilybelowgroundOrganic carbon: allocated heavily belowgroundallocated littlebelowgroundOrganic carbon: allocated little belowgroundenters soil food webOrganic carbon: enters soil food webtransferred through foodwebEnergy: transferred through food webStart: Belowgroundcarbon allocation toroots and mycorrhiz…STARTStart: Belowground carbon allocation to roots and mycorrhizal fungiEnd: Belowground carbonallocation to roots andmycorrhizal fungiENDEnd: Belowground carbon allocation to roots and mycorrhizal fungiPhotosynthate istranslocated to rootsand fungal partner📄1Photosynthate is translocated to roots and fungal partnerFungal hyphae deliverphosphorus to the plant📄1Fungal hyphae deliver phosphorus to the plantPhosphorus availabilitysets the carbon cost ofnutrient uptake📄1Phosphorus availability sets the carbon cost of nutrient uptakeP-poor soil: highbelowground allocationand carbon cost📄1P-poor soil: high belowground allocation and carbon costP-rich soil: lowbelowground allocationand carbon cost📄1P-rich soil: low belowground allocation and carbon costRoot-derived carbonenters the soil foodweb📄1Root-derived carbon enters the soil food web
Line thickness = size of impact (1 to 5)% on a line = chance a fork takes that branch📄 = pieces of evidence on a stepNegative effectLoops backHypothesisResource used up (arrow into the step)Resource used, not used upResource made or released (arrow out of the step)
What am I looking at? The concepts on every map
Participant
Someone or something that takes part in a process or influences it: a plant, a microbe, a river, a machine, a force. Participants are the rows of a map.
Resource
Something a step uses or uses up: water, oxygen, sunlight, a tool. Each step has an arrow down to the resources it uses.
Step
One thing that happens in a process. Every step has at least one participant and carries evidence.
Decision fork
A step where the process can go several ways. Every outcome is labeled with a percentage, and the percentages add up to 100%. It is not limited to yes or no.
Loop
A line that carries the process back to an earlier step. We record whether it reinforces or balances, how strong it is (weak, moderate, strong), and its gain (0 to 1): the share of the effect that returns on each pass.
Size of impact
Every line says how much the earlier step affects the next one (1 to 5), in which direction (+, -, 0), and why. Thicker lines mean bigger impact.
Evidence
The support for a claim: a source and what it shows. Every step, line, change and vote needs it. Click any step or line to read its evidence.
Boundary
Where a process starts and where it ends. Every process, and every subprocess, has a start and an end.
Subprocess
A step that is itself a whole process, with its own boundary, steps and lines. Click a step marked ↘ to open it. Subprocesses nest as deep as the evidence goes.
Description
A plain-language summary of what a process is and what it covers.
Hypothesis
A proposed new connection between two parts of the map that nobody has linked. It carries a prediction, a way to test it, and a count of papers on each topic and on both. It is an unverified idea until someone tests it.

Every step, with its evidence

The same information as the map, as a list you can search and share. Click a participant or resource to see everywhere it appears.

Photosynthate is translocated to roots and fungal partner
Evidence (1) · added by Verity
  • Douds 1988, Carbon cost of the fungal symbiont relative to net leaf P accumulation in a split-root VA mycorrhizal symbiosis, Plant Physiology, doi:10.1104/pp.86.2.491: In citrus split-root plants 3 to 4% of recently labelled photosynthate went to metabolism of the mycorrhiza in each colonized root half. (confidence 0.8)
Fungal hyphae deliver phosphorus to the plant
Evidence (1) · added by Verity
  • Ven 2019, Experimental evidence that phosphorus fertilization and arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis can reduce the carbon cost of phosphorus uptake, Functional Ecology, doi:10.1111/1365-2435.13452: AMF-inoculated maize were compared with pasteurized-soil plants to measure the carbon cost of P uptake. (confidence 0.7)
⑂ Phosphorus availability sets the carbon cost of nutrient uptake
Evidence (1) · added by Verity
  • Ven 2019, Experimental evidence that phosphorus fertilization and arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis can reduce the carbon cost of phosphorus uptake, Functional Ecology, doi:10.1111/1365-2435.13452: P fertilization tended to reduce belowground carbon investment; branch shares are rough estimates. (confidence 0.4)
P-poor soil: high belowground allocation and carbon cost
Evidence (1) · added by Verity
  • Ven 2019, Experimental evidence that phosphorus fertilization and arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis can reduce the carbon cost of phosphorus uptake, Functional Ecology, doi:10.1111/1365-2435.13452: Increasing nutrient availability typically reduces C investment in root growth and mycorrhizal fungi, so low availability raises it. (confidence 0.75)
P-rich soil: low belowground allocation and carbon cost
Evidence (1) · added by Verity
  • Ven 2019, Experimental evidence that phosphorus fertilization and arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis can reduce the carbon cost of phosphorus uptake, Functional Ecology, doi:10.1111/1365-2435.13452: P fertilization reduced the carbon cost of P uptake in Zea mays. (confidence 0.75)
Root-derived carbon enters the soil food web
Evidence (1) · added by Verity
  • Gilbert 2014, Exploring carbon flow through the root channel in a temperate forest soil food web, Soil Biology and Biochemistry, doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.05.005: A 13C pulse from sugar maple roots reached earthworms, weevils, ants and litter-layer predators, showing the root channel supplies soil heterotroph energy. (confidence 0.8)