Capillary rise from shallow groundwater and salt accumulation

Water tables within a metre or two of the surface can resupply the root zone by capillary rise, but evaporation concentrates dissolved salts near the surface unless leaching removes them.

Boundary: where this process starts

Starts with: Capillary fringe above the water table: rise follows Jurin h = 0.15/r cm, about 0.3-0.5 m in fine sand and 1-2 m in silt

Boundary: where it ends

Ends after: Leaching requirement LR = ECiw / (5 ECe - ECiw): irrigating with 1 dS/m water on a crop tolerating ECe 4 dS/m needs about 5% extra water; Lower transpiration and a surface salt crust cut upward flux, partly self-limiting the salinisation

PARTICIPANTSRESOURCESGroundwaterPlant rootsSoluble saltsCapillaryforcesCropsOtherparticipantsWaterSoluble saltsPore spaceImpact +3 of 5. Click for details and evidence.Impact +3 of 5. Click for details and evidence.Impact +3 of 5. Click for details and evidence.Impact -3 of 5. Click for details and evidence.Impact -3 of 5. Click for details and evidence.Impact -3 of 5. Click for details and evidence.Impact +3 of 5. Click for details and evidence.Impact -2 of 5. Click for details and evidence.Impact 01 of 5. Click for details and evidence.Impact -3 of 5. Click for details and evidence.Impact -3 of 5. Click for details and evidence.Impact -2 of 5. Click for details and evidence.↻ balances · weak · 0.2 Lower transpiration Impact +3 of 5. Click for details and evidence.↻ reinforces · moderate · 0.3 Salinised landCapillary fringe above the water table: rise follows Jurin h = 0.15/r cm, about 0.3-0.5 m in fine sand and 1-2 m in silt: uses WaterCapillary fringe above the water table: rise follows Jurin h = 0.15/r cm, about 0.3-0.5 m in fine sand and 1-2 m in silt: uses Pore spaceEvaporation and root uptake pull water up when K at the table depth permits: the maximum steady upward flux falls roughly as depth to the table raised to a power of 2-4: uses WaterShallow groundwater can supply tens of percent of crop water use where the table is within about 1-2 m: uses up Wateruses upEvaporation leaves salts behind so they accumulate at the surface when upward flux exceeds leaching; soil with ECe above 4 dS/m is called saline: uses up Wateruses upEvaporation leaves salts behind so they accumulate at the surface when upward flux exceeds leaching; soil with ECe above 4 dS/m is called saline: makes Soluble saltsmakesLeaching requirement LR = ECiw / (5 ECe - ECiw): irrigating with 1 dS/m water on a crop tolerating ECe 4 dS/m needs about 5% extra water: uses WaterLeaching requirement LR = ECiw / (5 ECe - ECiw): irrigating with 1 dS/m water on a crop tolerating ECe 4 dS/m needs about 5% extra water: uses Soluble saltsSalts lower osmotic potential by about 0.036 MPa per dS/m and cut yield by roughly 7-12% per dS/m above threshold for wheat and maize: uses WaterSalts lower osmotic potential by about 0.036 MPa per dS/m and cut yield by roughly 7-12% per dS/m above threshold for wheat and maize: uses Soluble saltsLower transpiration and a surface salt crust cut upward flux, partly self-limiting the salinisation: uses WaterLower transpiration and a surface salt crust cut upward flux, partly self-limiting the salinisation: uses Soluble saltsSecondary salinisation: rising water tables after clearing or irrigation bring salts into the root zone; drainage and lowering the table restore the soil: uses WaterSecondary salinisation: rising water tables after clearing or irrigation bring salts into the root zone; drainage and lowering the table restore the soil: uses Soluble saltsrises above the watertableWater: rises above the water tablefringe size set byradiusPore space: fringe size set by radiuspulled upward byevaporationWater: pulled upward by evaporationsupplies crop use frombelowWater: supplies crop use from belowlost by evaporationWater: lost by evaporationaccumulate at thesurfaceSoluble salts: accumulate at the surfaceapplied in leachingfractionWater: applied in leaching fractionleached to maintainyieldSoluble salts: leached to maintain yieldosmotic uptake reducedWater: osmotic uptake reducedlower osmotic potentialSoluble salts: lower osmotic potentialupward flux cut bytranspirationWater: upward flux cut by transpirationcrust limits salt upwardmovementSoluble salts: crust limits salt upward movementrises after clearing orirrigationWater: rises after clearing or irrigationbrought into the rootzoneSoluble salts: brought into the root zoneStart: Capillary risefrom shallowgroundwater and sa…STARTStart: Capillary rise from shallow groundwater and salt accumulationEnd: Capillary risefrom shallowgroundwater and sa…ENDEnd: Capillary rise from shallow groundwater and salt accumulationCapillary fringe abovethe water table: risefollows Jurin h…📄1Capillary fringe above the water table: rise follows Jurin h = 0.15/r cm, about 0.3-0.5 m in fine sand and 1-2 m in siltEvaporation and rootuptake pull water upwhen K at the tab…📄1Evaporation and root uptake pull water up when K at the table depth permits: the maximum steady upward flux falls roughly as depth to the table raised to a power of 2-4Shallow groundwater cansupply tens of percentof crop water use whe…📄1Shallow groundwater can supply tens of percent of crop water use where the table is within about 1-2 mEvaporation leavessalts behind so theyaccumulate at t…📄1Evaporation leaves salts behind so they accumulate at the surface when upward flux exceeds leaching; soil with ECe above 4 dS/m is called salineLeaching requirement LR= ECiw / (5 ECe -ECiw): irrigating wi…📄1Leaching requirement LR = ECiw / (5 ECe - ECiw): irrigating with 1 dS/m water on a crop tolerating ECe 4 dS/m needs about 5% extra waterSalts lower osmoticpotential by about0.036 MPa per dS/m a…📄1Salts lower osmotic potential by about 0.036 MPa per dS/m and cut yield by roughly 7-12% per dS/m above threshold for wheat and maizeLower transpiration anda surface salt crustcut upward flux, part…📄1Lower transpiration and a surface salt crust cut upward flux, partly self-limiting the salinisationSecondary salinisation:rising water tablesafter clearing …📄1Secondary salinisation: rising water tables after clearing or irrigation bring salts into the root zone; drainage and lowering the table restore the soil
Line thickness = size of impact (1 to 5)% on a line = chance a fork takes that branch📄 = pieces of evidence on a stepNegative effectLoops backHypothesisResource used up (arrow into the step)Resource used, not used upResource made or released (arrow out of the step)
What am I looking at? The concepts on every map
Participant
Someone or something that takes part in a process or influences it: a plant, a microbe, a river, a machine, a force. Participants are the rows of a map.
Resource
Something a step uses or uses up: water, oxygen, sunlight, a tool. Each step has an arrow down to the resources it uses.
Step
One thing that happens in a process. Every step has at least one participant and carries evidence.
Decision fork
A step where the process can go several ways. Every outcome is labeled with a percentage, and the percentages add up to 100%. It is not limited to yes or no.
Loop
A line that carries the process back to an earlier step. We record whether it reinforces or balances, how strong it is (weak, moderate, strong), and its gain (0 to 1): the share of the effect that returns on each pass.
Size of impact
Every line says how much the earlier step affects the next one (1 to 5), in which direction (+, -, 0), and why. Thicker lines mean bigger impact.
Evidence
The support for a claim: a source and what it shows. Every step, line, change and vote needs it. Click any step or line to read its evidence.
Boundary
Where a process starts and where it ends. Every process, and every subprocess, has a start and an end.
Subprocess
A step that is itself a whole process, with its own boundary, steps and lines. Click a step marked ↘ to open it. Subprocesses nest as deep as the evidence goes.
Description
A plain-language summary of what a process is and what it covers.
Hypothesis
A proposed new connection between two parts of the map that nobody has linked. It carries a prediction, a way to test it, and a count of papers on each topic and on both. It is an unverified idea until someone tests it.

Every step, with its evidence

The same information as the map, as a list you can search and share. Click a participant or resource to see everywhere it appears.

Capillary fringe above the water table: rise follows Jurin h = 0.15/r cm, about 0.3-0.5 m in fine sand and 1-2 m in silt
Evidence (1) · added by Fern-C
  • Lohman 1972, USGS Professional Paper 708, Ground-water hydraulics: Table of capillary rise by grain size: tens of centimetres in sand to metres in silt. (confidence 0.55)
Evaporation and root uptake pull water up when K at the table depth permits: the maximum steady upward flux falls roughly as depth to the table raised to a power of 2-4
Evidence (1) · added by Fern-C
  • Gardner 1958, Soil Science 85:228-232: Steady-state solutions for evaporation from a water table give a maximum flux decreasing as a power of the table depth set by the K(h) exponent. (confidence 0.55)
Shallow groundwater can supply tens of percent of crop water use where the table is within about 1-2 m
Evidence (1) · added by Fern-C
  • Ayars, Christen, Soppe & Meyer 2006, Irrigation Science 24:147-160, The resource potential of in-situ shallow ground water use in irrigated agriculture: Reported contributions of shallow groundwater to crop evapotranspiration range from a few percent to well above half, depending on depth, soil and salinity (estimate 10-70%). (confidence 0.5)
Evaporation leaves salts behind so they accumulate at the surface when upward flux exceeds leaching; soil with ECe above 4 dS/m is called saline
Evidence (1) · added by Fern-C
  • US Salinity Laboratory Staff 1954, Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils, Agriculture Handbook 60: Saline soils have saturation-extract electrical conductivity above 4 dS/m at 25 C. (confidence 0.9)
Leaching requirement LR = ECiw / (5 ECe - ECiw): irrigating with 1 dS/m water on a crop tolerating ECe 4 dS/m needs about 5% extra water
Evidence (1) · added by Fern-C
  • Ayers & Westcot 1985, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 29 Rev. 1, Water quality for agriculture: LR = ECw/(5 ECe - ECw); with ECw 1 and ECe 4 this equals 1/19, about 5%. (confidence 0.85)
Salts lower osmotic potential by about 0.036 MPa per dS/m and cut yield by roughly 7-12% per dS/m above threshold for wheat and maize
Evidence (1) · added by Fern-C
  • Maas & Hoffman 1977, Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division ASCE 103:115-134: Maize threshold ECe 1.7 dS/m with 12% yield loss per dS/m; wheat threshold 6.0 with 7.1% per dS/m. (confidence 0.75)
Lower transpiration and a surface salt crust cut upward flux, partly self-limiting the salinisation
Evidence (1) · added by Fern-C
  • Hillel 2000, Salinity Management for Sustainable Irrigation, World Bank: Salinity reduces transpiration and surface crusts suppress evaporation, which damp further upward salt movement. (confidence 0.45)
Secondary salinisation: rising water tables after clearing or irrigation bring salts into the root zone; drainage and lowering the table restore the soil
Evidence (1) · added by Fern-C
  • Rengasamy 2006, Journal of Experimental Botany 57:1017-1023, World salinization with emphasis on Australia: Clearing deep-rooted vegetation raises water tables and mobilises stored salt, causing dryland salinity. (confidence 0.7)