Earth's Systems / Biological processes / Terrestrial ecosystem functioning / Living soil system / Roots and rhizosphere / Root exudate chemistry, fate and priming
Root exudate chemistry, fate and priming
Roots release sugars, amino acids, organic anions and signalling compounds by passive and active efflux. The exudates are mostly taken up by microbes within hours, with smaller shares re-absorbed by roots, sorbed to minerals or leached.
Boundary: where this process starts
Starts with: Passive efflux of sugars and amino acids down a concentration gradient of roughly 1000:1 from cytosol to soil solution
Boundary: where it ends
Ends after: Exudate priming and microbial nitrogen mining; Sorption of organic acids and DOC to Fe and Al oxides and clay edges
Line thickness = size of impact (1 to 5)% on a line = chance a fork takes that branch📄 = pieces of evidence on a stepNegative effectLoops backHypothesisResource used up (arrow into the step)Resource used, not used upResource made or released (arrow out of the step)
What am I looking at? The concepts on every map
- Participant
- Someone or something that takes part in a process or influences it: a plant, a microbe, a river, a machine, a force. Participants are the rows of a map.
- Resource
- Something a step uses or uses up: water, oxygen, sunlight, a tool. Each step has an arrow down to the resources it uses.
- Step
- One thing that happens in a process. Every step has at least one participant and carries evidence.
- Decision fork
- A step where the process can go several ways. Every outcome is labeled with a percentage, and the percentages add up to 100%. It is not limited to yes or no.
- Loop
- A line that carries the process back to an earlier step. We record whether it reinforces or balances, how strong it is (weak, moderate, strong), and its gain (0 to 1): the share of the effect that returns on each pass.
- Size of impact
- Every line says how much the earlier step affects the next one (1 to 5), in which direction (+, -, 0), and why. Thicker lines mean bigger impact.
- Evidence
- The support for a claim: a source and what it shows. Every step, line, change and vote needs it. Click any step or line to read its evidence.
- Boundary
- Where a process starts and where it ends. Every process, and every subprocess, has a start and an end.
- Subprocess
- A step that is itself a whole process, with its own boundary, steps and lines. Click a step marked ↘ to open it. Subprocesses nest as deep as the evidence goes.
- Description
- A plain-language summary of what a process is and what it covers.
- Hypothesis
- A proposed new connection between two parts of the map that nobody has linked. It carries a prediction, a way to test it, and a count of papers on each topic and on both. It is an unverified idea until someone tests it.
Inside this process
Every step, with its evidence
The same information as the map, as a list you can search and share. Click a participant or resource to see everywhere it appears.
Passive efflux of sugars and amino acids down a concentration gradient of roughly 1000:1 from cytosol to soil solution
Evidence (1) · added by Ember
- Jones, Nguyen & Finlay 2009, Carbon flow in the rhizosphere: carbon trading at the soil-root interface, Plant and Soil 321:5-33: Cytosolic sugar and amino acid concentrations are mM versus micromolar in soil solution, driving passive loss through membranes (confidence 0.75)
Active efflux of organic anions (malate, citrate) through anion channels and MATE transporters
Evidence (1) · added by Ember
- Ryan, Delhaize & Jones 2001, Function and mechanism of organic anion exudation from plant roots, Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 52:527-560: Organic anion release proceeds through channels activated by Al, low P or other stress (confidence 0.8)
Signalling compounds released: flavonoids, strigolactones, benzoxazinoids, coumarins
Evidence (2) · added by Ember
- Akiyama, Matsuzaki & Hayashi 2005, Plant sesquiterpenes induce hyphal branching in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, Nature 435:824-827: Root-derived strigolactone induces hyphal branching in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (confidence 0.85)
- Badri & Vivanco 2009, Regulation and function of root exudates, Plant, Cell & Environment 32:666-681: Secondary metabolites in exudates shape microbial recruitment (confidence 0.75)
⑂ Exudate compounds enter soil solution with half-lives of minutes to hours
Evidence (1) · added by Ember
- Jones, Nguyen & Finlay 2009, Carbon flow in the rhizosphere: carbon trading at the soil-root interface, Plant and Soil 321:5-33: Low molecular weight exudates turn over in soil within minutes to a few hours; shares below are estimates, plausible ranges 60-85% microbial, 5-20% root re-uptake (confidence 0.5)
Microbial uptake: part respired, part built into biomass (carbon use efficiency 0.3-0.6)
Evidence (1) · added by Ember
- Sinsabaugh et al. 2013, Carbon use efficiency of microbial communities: stoichiometry, methodology and modelling, Ecology Letters 16:930-939: Community carbon use efficiency typically ranges about 0.3-0.6 and depends on stoichiometry and temperature (confidence 0.75)
Root re-uptake of amino acids by membrane transporters recaptures nitrogen
Evidence (1) · added by Ember
- Owen & Jones 2001, Competition for amino acids between wheat roots and rhizosphere microorganisms, Soil Biol Biochem 33:651-657: Wheat roots compete with microbes and recapture amino acids from soil, so net exudation is efflux minus influx (confidence 0.75)
Sorption of organic acids and DOC to Fe and Al oxides and clay edges
Evidence (1) · added by Ember
- Kaiser & Guggenberger 2000, The role of DOM sorption to mineral surfaces in the preservation of organic matter in soils, Organic Geochemistry 31:711-725: DOM sorbs preferentially to oxides and clay, removing it from solution and protecting it (confidence 0.8)
Small share leached below the rhizosphere as dissolved organic carbon
Evidence (1) · added by Ember
- Jones, Nguyen & Finlay 2009, Carbon flow in the rhizosphere: carbon trading at the soil-root interface, Plant and Soil 321:5-33: A small fraction of exudate carbon escapes microbial and mineral sinks (confidence 0.55)
Exudate-derived microbial biomass and necromass accumulate near root
Evidence (1) · added by Ember
- Cheng et al. 2014, Synthesis and modeling perspectives of rhizosphere priming, New Phytologist 201:31-44: Rhizodeposits are a main input to microbial biomass near roots (confidence 0.65)
↘ Exudate priming and microbial nitrogen mining
Evidence (1) · added by Ember
- Kuzyakov 2010, Priming effects: interactions between living and dead organic matter, Soil Biol Biochem 42:1363-1371: Reviews real and apparent priming of soil organic matter by labile carbon (confidence 0.8)