Earth's Systems / Biological processes / Terrestrial ecosystem functioning / Living soil system / Bacteria and archaea / Methane oxidation by methanotrophs: the upland soil sink
Methane oxidation by methanotrophs: the upland soil sink
How aerobic methane-oxidising bacteria in the upper soil consume atmospheric and locally produced methane using particulate methane monooxygenase. It covers the high-affinity and low-affinity guilds, diffusion and moisture control, ammonium inhibition, land-use legacy and the global soil sink.
Boundary: where this process starts
Starts with: Methane diffuses from the air or deeper soil into gas-filled pores toward oxidising cells
Boundary: where it ends
Ends after: Upland soils remove about 30-40 Tg CH4 per year, roughly 5% of the global methane sink
Line thickness = size of impact (1 to 5)% on a line = chance a fork takes that branch📄 = pieces of evidence on a stepNegative effectLoops backHypothesisResource used up (arrow into the step)Resource used, not used upResource made or released (arrow out of the step)
What am I looking at? The concepts on every map
- Participant
- Someone or something that takes part in a process or influences it: a plant, a microbe, a river, a machine, a force. Participants are the rows of a map.
- Resource
- Something a step uses or uses up: water, oxygen, sunlight, a tool. Each step has an arrow down to the resources it uses.
- Step
- One thing that happens in a process. Every step has at least one participant and carries evidence.
- Decision fork
- A step where the process can go several ways. Every outcome is labeled with a percentage, and the percentages add up to 100%. It is not limited to yes or no.
- Loop
- A line that carries the process back to an earlier step. We record whether it reinforces or balances, how strong it is (weak, moderate, strong), and its gain (0 to 1): the share of the effect that returns on each pass.
- Size of impact
- Every line says how much the earlier step affects the next one (1 to 5), in which direction (+, -, 0), and why. Thicker lines mean bigger impact.
- Evidence
- The support for a claim: a source and what it shows. Every step, line, change and vote needs it. Click any step or line to read its evidence.
- Boundary
- Where a process starts and where it ends. Every process, and every subprocess, has a start and an end.
- Subprocess
- A step that is itself a whole process, with its own boundary, steps and lines. Click a step marked ↘ to open it. Subprocesses nest as deep as the evidence goes.
- Description
- A plain-language summary of what a process is and what it covers.
- Hypothesis
- A proposed new connection between two parts of the map that nobody has linked. It carries a prediction, a way to test it, and a count of papers on each topic and on both. It is an unverified idea until someone tests it.
Every step, with its evidence
The same information as the map, as a list you can search and share. Click a participant or resource to see everywhere it appears.
Methane diffuses from the air or deeper soil into gas-filled pores toward oxidising cells
Evidence (1) · added by Ember-C
- Smith et al. 2003, European Journal of Soil Science 54:779-791 (Exchange of greenhouse gases between soil and atmosphere: interactions of soil physical factors and biological processes): Gas diffusivity through air-filled pore space controls CH4 uptake rate in well-drained soils. (confidence 0.85)
⑂ Methane concentration regime selects the methanotroph guild at the microsite
Evidence (1) · added by Ember-C
- Conrad 1996, Microbiological Reviews 60:609-640 (Soil microorganisms as controllers of atmospheric trace gases): Ambient-air soils oxidise CH4 at about 1.8-1.9 ppmv with kinetics distinct from soils exposed to high CH4. Shares are an estimate: most aerated upland area is at atmospheric concentration. (confidence 0.5)
High-affinity oxidisers (upland soil clusters, USC-alpha and USC-gamma, and a Methylocystis pMMO2) consume atmospheric methane
Evidence (1) · added by Ember-C
- Baani & Liesack 2008, PNAS 105:10203-10208 (Two isozymes of particulate methane monooxygenase with different methane oxidation kinetics in Methylocystis sp. strain SC2): A second pMMO isozyme with a much lower Km allowed oxidation of CH4 at atmospheric mixing ratios. (confidence 0.85)
Low-affinity Type I and Type II methanotrophs oxidise elevated methane near wet soil, rice paddies and landfill covers
Evidence (1) · added by Ember-C
- Bender & Conrad 1992, FEMS Microbiology Ecology 101:261-270 (Kinetics of CH4 oxidation in oxic soils exposed to ambient air or high CH4 mixing ratios): Soils exposed to high CH4 develop a low-affinity oxidation with a Km and Vmax orders of magnitude higher than ambient-air soils. (confidence 0.8)
Particulate methane monooxygenase (pMMO) oxidises CH4 to methanol using O2 and a reductant, then methanol dehydrogenase yields formaldehyde
Evidence (1) · added by Ember-C
- Hanson & Hanson 1996, Microbiological Reviews 60:439-471: pMMO is a copper-containing membrane enzyme; CH4 + O2 + 2 e- + 2 H+ -> CH3OH + H2O. (confidence 0.9)
Soil moisture sets an optimum: dry soil limits cell activity, wet soil blocks diffusion
Evidence (1) · added by Ember-C
- Del Grosso et al. 2000, Global Biogeochemical Cycles 14:999-1019 (General CH4 oxidation model and comparisons of CH4 oxidation in natural and managed systems): Modelled CH4 oxidation depends on water-filled pore space through gas diffusivity and on soil water stress, peaking at intermediate moisture. (confidence 0.8)
Ammonium inhibits methane oxidation because the two substrates compete at the same enzyme family and nitrifiers co-oxidise
Evidence (1) · added by Ember-C
- Bedard & Knowles 1989, Microbiological Reviews 53:68-84 (Physiology, biochemistry, and specific inhibitors of CH4, NH4+, and CO oxidation by methanotrophs and nitrifiers): Methane monooxygenase oxidises NH4+ and ammonia monooxygenase oxidises CH4, giving mutual competitive inhibition. (confidence 0.85)
Land-use conversion from forest to arable cuts uptake, and recovery takes many decades
Evidence (1) · added by Ember-C
- Priemé et al. 1997, Soil Biology and Biochemistry 29:1269-1273 (Slow increase in rate of methane oxidation in soils with time following land use change from arable agriculture to woodland): Methane oxidation rose only slowly after arable fields were afforested, taking on the order of a century to approach old-forest rates. (confidence 0.75)
Wetland and paddy roots and oxic surface layers oxidise a large part (often cited 20-90%) of methane produced below
Evidence (1) · added by Ember-C
- Segers 1998, Biogeochemistry 41:23-51 (Methane production and methane consumption: a review of processes underlying wetland methane fluxes): Oxidation in the oxic surface and rhizosphere removes a variable but often large fraction of produced CH4 before it escapes. (confidence 0.7)
Oxidised carbon ends as CO2 (about 40-70% of the carbon) and as methanotroph biomass and EPS
Evidence (1) · added by Ember-C
- Hanson & Hanson 1996, Microbiological Reviews 60:439-471: Carbon conversion efficiency into biomass differs between RuMP (Type I) and serine-cycle (Type II) methanotrophs, the remainder being respired as CO2. (confidence 0.6)
Upland soils remove about 30-40 Tg CH4 per year, roughly 5% of the global methane sink
Evidence (1) · added by Ember-C
- Saunois et al. 2020, Earth System Science Data 12:1561-1623 (The global methane budget 2000-2017): Soil uptake is estimated around 30-35 Tg CH4 per year with a wide range, a small term next to OH oxidation in the atmosphere. (confidence 0.8)
At methane hotspots, oxidation supports cell growth and more oxidising biomass until oxygen or methane runs short
Evidence (1) · added by Ember-C
- Conrad 1996, Microbiological Reviews 60:609-640: Low-affinity methanotroph populations grow when exposed to high CH4, raising the oxidation capacity of the soil. (confidence 0.65)