Earth's Systems / Biological processes / Terrestrial ecosystem functioning / Living soil system / Nutrient availability and leaching / Nitrate leaching from the root zone to groundwater and coastal waters
Nitrate leaching from the root zone to groundwater and coastal waters
Nitrate, a mobile anion not held by negatively charged soil, is flushed out of the root zone by autumn and winter drainage, reaching drains, groundwater and rivers. Cover crops and riparian buffers cut the load, but the nitrogen that reaches rivers drives coastal hypoxia.
Boundary: where this process starts
Starts with: Nitrate is not adsorbed by net-negative soil surfaces and moves with drainage water, taking base cations with it
Boundary: where it ends
Ends after: Nitrogen delivered by rivers fuels algal blooms and the seasonal hypoxic zone in the Gulf of Mexico; Riparian buffers remove about two thirds of nitrate on average (large range) by denitrification and uptake
Line thickness = size of impact (1 to 5)% on a line = chance a fork takes that branch📄 = pieces of evidence on a stepNegative effectLoops backHypothesisResource used up (arrow into the step)Resource used, not used upResource made or released (arrow out of the step)
What am I looking at? The concepts on every map
- Participant
- Someone or something that takes part in a process or influences it: a plant, a microbe, a river, a machine, a force. Participants are the rows of a map.
- Resource
- Something a step uses or uses up: water, oxygen, sunlight, a tool. Each step has an arrow down to the resources it uses.
- Step
- One thing that happens in a process. Every step has at least one participant and carries evidence.
- Decision fork
- A step where the process can go several ways. Every outcome is labeled with a percentage, and the percentages add up to 100%. It is not limited to yes or no.
- Loop
- A line that carries the process back to an earlier step. We record whether it reinforces or balances, how strong it is (weak, moderate, strong), and its gain (0 to 1): the share of the effect that returns on each pass.
- Size of impact
- Every line says how much the earlier step affects the next one (1 to 5), in which direction (+, -, 0), and why. Thicker lines mean bigger impact.
- Evidence
- The support for a claim: a source and what it shows. Every step, line, change and vote needs it. Click any step or line to read its evidence.
- Boundary
- Where a process starts and where it ends. Every process, and every subprocess, has a start and an end.
- Subprocess
- A step that is itself a whole process, with its own boundary, steps and lines. Click a step marked ↘ to open it. Subprocesses nest as deep as the evidence goes.
- Description
- A plain-language summary of what a process is and what it covers.
- Hypothesis
- A proposed new connection between two parts of the map that nobody has linked. It carries a prediction, a way to test it, and a count of papers on each topic and on both. It is an unverified idea until someone tests it.
Every step, with its evidence
The same information as the map, as a list you can search and share. Click a participant or resource to see everywhere it appears.
Nitrate is not adsorbed by net-negative soil surfaces and moves with drainage water, taking base cations with it
Evidence (1) · added by Fern
- Addiscott, Whitmore & Powlson (1991), Farming, Fertilizers and the Nitrate Problem, CAB International: Nitrate behaves almost as a conservative solute in soil water, so drainage volume determines transport. (confidence 0.8)
Most leaching occurs in autumn and winter, when the crop is gone, mineralisation continues and drainage is highest
Evidence (1) · added by Fern
- Di & Cameron (2002), Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 64:237-256: Leaching losses concentrate in the drainage season after crop uptake ends. (confidence 0.8)
Cover or catch crops take up residual nitrate; non-legume cover crops cut leaching by about 70 percent and legume covers by about 40 percent
Evidence (1) · added by Fern
- Tonitto, David & Drinkwater (2006), Replacing bare fallows with cover crops in fertilizer-intensive cropping systems: a meta-analysis of crop yield and N dynamics, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 112:58-72: Non-legume cover crops reduced N leaching by about 70 percent and legume covers by about 40 percent relative to fallow. (confidence 0.8)
Nitrate reaches drains and groundwater; the US drinking-water limit is 10 mg nitrate-N per litre
Evidence (1) · added by Fern
- US EPA, National Primary Drinking Water Regulations, 40 CFR 141.62 (maximum contaminant level for nitrate 10 mg per L as N): The maximum contaminant level for nitrate is 10 mg per L as nitrogen. (confidence 0.9)
Riparian buffers remove about two thirds of nitrate on average (large range) by denitrification and uptake
Evidence (1) · added by Fern
- Mayer, Reynolds, McCutchen & Canfield (2007), Meta-analysis of nitrogen removal in riparian buffers, Journal of Environmental Quality 36:1172-1180: Riparian buffers removed on average about 67 percent of nitrate in a large meta-analysis, with wide variation. (confidence 0.65)
Nitrogen delivered by rivers fuels algal blooms and the seasonal hypoxic zone in the Gulf of Mexico
Evidence (1) · added by Fern
- Rabalais, Turner & Wiseman (2002), Gulf of Mexico hypoxia, a.k.a. the dead zone, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33:235-263: Nutrient loads from the Mississippi River drive stratified bottom-water hypoxia. (confidence 0.85)